C'mon, ya really gotta know that you can't bring guns across the border.
U.S. tourists busted for Winnebago gun arsenal
VANCOUVER — Two American tourists spent five days in jail, put up $50,000 each in bail and are facing three years behind bars after border guards seized a small arsenal of firearms at the U.S.-Canada border crossing last week.
Danny Cross, brother-in-law Hugh Barr and their wives were on their way to Alaska to celebrate Cross's wedding anniversary when they were stopped at the Aldergrove-Huntington border crossing, 65 kilometres southeast of Vancouver, on July 11.
Cross is 64 and from Texas; Barr is 70 and from California.
The Canada Border Service Agency said that when officers searched their 2008 Winnebago after they said they had nothing to declare, the officers found a derringer-type pistol, a cowboy-style revolver, three semi-automatic pistols and a shotgun.
"The travellers did not declare any firearms during the primary examination but firearms were discovered in the vehicle during a secondary examination," said CBSA official Stefanie Wudel.
Read the rest here
Friday, July 22, 2011
Thursday, July 14, 2011
Seriously???
The 'sniff test'? EEW!!!
Real men wear dirty underwear, survey shows
When it comes to airing their dirty laundry in public, men win hands down. Or noses up, as the case may be.
A survey by Clorox found that nearly 50 per cent of men have no problem wearing clothes - including underwear - many times before washing them.
It's not that men have something against clean clothes. It's the cleaning of the clothes that's the sticky point.
The survey, which involved phone interviews with 1,200 adults, found that when men do the laundry, nearly 50 per cent of them rely on a "sniff test" to determine whether the clothes need washing.
Blue jeans average five wearings between washings. Underwear is worn twice, although 12 per cent of the men said they'll often manage a third use.
One might think that single men looking to impress the ladies would have cleaner clothes than men involved in committed relationships. But it's actually the other way around, according to Clorox scientist Mary Gagliardi, who blogs for the company under the moniker Dr. Laundry.
Men in relationships tend to wear clothes that are cleaned more often, although who is actually cleaning them is up for debate.
Nearly 41 per cent of men told pollsters that they share laundry responsibilities with their partners. But when women were asked the same question, only 29 per cent of them reported that their men were helping.
Read more:
Real men wear dirty underwear, survey shows
When it comes to airing their dirty laundry in public, men win hands down. Or noses up, as the case may be.
A survey by Clorox found that nearly 50 per cent of men have no problem wearing clothes - including underwear - many times before washing them.
It's not that men have something against clean clothes. It's the cleaning of the clothes that's the sticky point.
The survey, which involved phone interviews with 1,200 adults, found that when men do the laundry, nearly 50 per cent of them rely on a "sniff test" to determine whether the clothes need washing.
Blue jeans average five wearings between washings. Underwear is worn twice, although 12 per cent of the men said they'll often manage a third use.
One might think that single men looking to impress the ladies would have cleaner clothes than men involved in committed relationships. But it's actually the other way around, according to Clorox scientist Mary Gagliardi, who blogs for the company under the moniker Dr. Laundry.
Men in relationships tend to wear clothes that are cleaned more often, although who is actually cleaning them is up for debate.
Nearly 41 per cent of men told pollsters that they share laundry responsibilities with their partners. But when women were asked the same question, only 29 per cent of them reported that their men were helping.
Read more:
Saturday, June 25, 2011
The Babysitter
I remember when I was a rather small child that we lived on about 5 or 6 acres on the edge of High River in a very small house that had a barn out the back and a small pasture on the south side. I don't remember how many horses we had at the time but I do remember one of them.
My Mom had a half-Arab mare named Danny that can't have been very big, but we loved her anyway. We used to go outside of an afternoon and go 'riding'. I must have been four or five and my sister Karen a year and a half younger. We'd salvage a piece of baling twine from the barn and head out to the pasture to capture Danny. She'd have her head down grazing and we'd walk up to her, stand in front of her and with one end of the twine in each hand, try to flip the loop over her head. After several catches of one ear, we'd finally accomplish our mission, fashion a 'halter' out of the twine and lead her over to the fence where the show began.
We'd get her side-ways to the fence and I'd crawl up it and try to get on. Danny was such a lady that she'd move over. Karen would lead her around in a circle and we'd try again. This went on for a while until Karen would walk back and push her bum over to the fence and hold her there. Phewf. Mounted. Now to get Karen up there. She'd climb the fence and lean over to get on, and of course Danny would move over. I'd ride her around in a circle back to the fence. Try again. Same performance over and over until we finally had her mounted.
By now we'd been out there for about an hour and we're finally ready to get this show on the road, and away we go. Danny would start out walking across the pasture and seeing that she was headed back to her buddies would break into a trot. Ok for me, I had her mane to gold on to. Karen? Not so much. She'd be holding on to my waist and start sliding to the side. Bounce, bounce, bounce an off we'd go. Danny would immediately stop, crane her head around and look at us like "What are you doing down there?" And we'd start the whole procedure over again. What better enertainment for Mom who watched us through the kitchen window?
Which is why, when I saw it, that I absolutely had to buy this.
![]()
My Mom had a half-Arab mare named Danny that can't have been very big, but we loved her anyway. We used to go outside of an afternoon and go 'riding'. I must have been four or five and my sister Karen a year and a half younger. We'd salvage a piece of baling twine from the barn and head out to the pasture to capture Danny. She'd have her head down grazing and we'd walk up to her, stand in front of her and with one end of the twine in each hand, try to flip the loop over her head. After several catches of one ear, we'd finally accomplish our mission, fashion a 'halter' out of the twine and lead her over to the fence where the show began.
We'd get her side-ways to the fence and I'd crawl up it and try to get on. Danny was such a lady that she'd move over. Karen would lead her around in a circle and we'd try again. This went on for a while until Karen would walk back and push her bum over to the fence and hold her there. Phewf. Mounted. Now to get Karen up there. She'd climb the fence and lean over to get on, and of course Danny would move over. I'd ride her around in a circle back to the fence. Try again. Same performance over and over until we finally had her mounted.
By now we'd been out there for about an hour and we're finally ready to get this show on the road, and away we go. Danny would start out walking across the pasture and seeing that she was headed back to her buddies would break into a trot. Ok for me, I had her mane to gold on to. Karen? Not so much. She'd be holding on to my waist and start sliding to the side. Bounce, bounce, bounce an off we'd go. Danny would immediately stop, crane her head around and look at us like "What are you doing down there?" And we'd start the whole procedure over again. What better enertainment for Mom who watched us through the kitchen window?
Which is why, when I saw it, that I absolutely had to buy this.
Thursday, June 23, 2011
A follow-up to 'I'm almost ashamed to be Canadian'
From the op/ed pages of today's paper.
Loving Canada
By Sue Williams, Calgary Herald June 23, 2011 Re: "Anger over the Vancouver riot goes on and on," Vance Rodewalt, Editorial Cartoon, June 21.
Your cartoon was almost spot on. I arrived last week in Calgary for a two-month summer vacation away from a sizzling Arizona and was surprised to see so much media coverage on the Vancouver "riots."
Lighten up, Canadians, and put things in perspective! The perpetrators of these shenanigans were idiots who probably had far too much beer and fell easily into mob mentalities. Yes, I can see where the disturbance would be embarrassing to Canadians, but stuff happens everywhere.
Trust me, you have not tarnished your reputation in the world.
Canadians are arguably the most compassionate, friendly, tolerant, environmentally conscious, courageous and generous people in the world. An article I read not too long ago touted Canada as the happiest nation on Earth -not surprising considering the customs and philosophies of its people.
It would take a lot more Vancouver events to even begin to sully Canada's name.
Sue Williams, Sedona, Ariz.
Read more:
Well thank you Sue, and welcome to Calgary. I hope you enjoy your stay.
Loving Canada
By Sue Williams, Calgary Herald June 23, 2011 Re: "Anger over the Vancouver riot goes on and on," Vance Rodewalt, Editorial Cartoon, June 21.
Your cartoon was almost spot on. I arrived last week in Calgary for a two-month summer vacation away from a sizzling Arizona and was surprised to see so much media coverage on the Vancouver "riots."
Lighten up, Canadians, and put things in perspective! The perpetrators of these shenanigans were idiots who probably had far too much beer and fell easily into mob mentalities. Yes, I can see where the disturbance would be embarrassing to Canadians, but stuff happens everywhere.
Trust me, you have not tarnished your reputation in the world.
Canadians are arguably the most compassionate, friendly, tolerant, environmentally conscious, courageous and generous people in the world. An article I read not too long ago touted Canada as the happiest nation on Earth -not surprising considering the customs and philosophies of its people.
It would take a lot more Vancouver events to even begin to sully Canada's name.
Sue Williams, Sedona, Ariz.
Read more:
Well thank you Sue, and welcome to Calgary. I hope you enjoy your stay.
Sunday, June 19, 2011
Happy Fathers' Day
A couple of songs for you Dad, with an explanation for why each has been put up.
This one is called 'Mothers of Teenage Daughters' and I know that this post is for Fathers but the lyric says it all about the relationship I had with you during those difficult years. Children don't come with owners' manuals (unfortunately for parents), and you always did the best that you could with what you had. Somehow we got through it all and you molded me into the person that I am today.
So here we go with Martina McBride.
This next selection is off of Keith Urban's 'Golden Road' album, 'Song For Dad'. I know that I sent this one to you a couple of years ago, but I had to send it again with an explanation for the rest of my readers.
The first time I heard this song I was driving down the road and I had to stop, hit 'get back' (or whatever it is in CD terms) and listen to it again. And again. This one reached out and grabbed me at my very core.
I thank you for all that you have done for me and I hope that when I grow up I can be more like you.
I love you Dad. Deb
And to all the Fathers that are my faithful, a happy Fathers' Day to you too.
This one is called 'Mothers of Teenage Daughters' and I know that this post is for Fathers but the lyric says it all about the relationship I had with you during those difficult years. Children don't come with owners' manuals (unfortunately for parents), and you always did the best that you could with what you had. Somehow we got through it all and you molded me into the person that I am today.
So here we go with Martina McBride.
This next selection is off of Keith Urban's 'Golden Road' album, 'Song For Dad'. I know that I sent this one to you a couple of years ago, but I had to send it again with an explanation for the rest of my readers.
The first time I heard this song I was driving down the road and I had to stop, hit 'get back' (or whatever it is in CD terms) and listen to it again. And again. This one reached out and grabbed me at my very core.
I thank you for all that you have done for me and I hope that when I grow up I can be more like you.
I love you Dad. Deb
And to all the Fathers that are my faithful, a happy Fathers' Day to you too.
Friday, June 17, 2011
From the Op/Ed pages of the Calgary Herald
Vancouver rioters should hang heads in shame
![]()
Canadians are engaged in a collective cringe of horror today over the senseless, thuggish behaviour of fans who looted, smashed windows and burned vehicles for three hours in Vancouver after the Canucks lost to the Bruins in the Stanley Cup final Wednesday night.
More than 100 people have been arrested — with additional arrests expected — and 15 cars, two of them police cruisers, were set on fire. Vancouver Police Chief Jim Chu blamed the carnage on “anarchists and criminals” who had outfitted themselves for the rioting with masks and goggles, and who he says had participated in violent protests in the past.
That sounds like a bit of public relations spin to deflect attention away from the more likely possibility that these were ordinary youthful Vancouverites, overdosing on testosterone and stupidity, ready to take out their anger at losing the Cup, albeit incomprehensibly targeting their own city. They were dressed for the most part in Canucks jerseys, for one thing, which is something “anarchists and criminals” wouldn’t do. They can certainly be categorized as criminals, given their lawlessness Wednesday night, but Chu makes it sound as if they specifically organized to trash the downtown, as part of their career criminality. Moreover, “anarchists” who frequent violent protests do so for political reasons, not because a hockey team lost a game.
No, these were most likely ordinary youthful Canadians showing a disgusting dearth of sportsmanship and an equally disgusting un-Canadian proclivity toward mindless violence, of the sort usually associated with the yobs and rowdies who riot after British soccer matches.
However, a truly Canadian attitude was at work Thursday morning in downtown Vancouver, as evidenced by the dozens of Vancouverites who, appalled at the wanton vandalism, arson and theft that left many storefronts boarded up, showed up with brooms in hand to help clean up the mess. Others took the opportunity to scribble messages of collective sorrow, sympathy and solidarity with those affected by the looting, on the boards covering the broken storefront windows.
Canadians are disappointed that the Cup slipped out of the Canucks’ hands and went home with the Bruins. It was especially hard to see a trophy representing Canada’s national sport head south for another year to rest with an American team. But the noble virtue of sportsmanship compels Canada to accept the loss with good grace; it’s not losing the Stanley Cup that has left a black mark on Canada, it’s the behaviour of the rioters in Vancouver.
In the end, it was just a game, and there’ll be more games. Hockey season starts anew in a few months, and next year, Lord Stanley may return to Canada — ideally, to the Red Mile.
Canadians have nothing to live down in losing to the Bruins. They can hold their heads high. It is only the rioters in Vancouver who should hang their heads in shame.
Read more:
Canadians are engaged in a collective cringe of horror today over the senseless, thuggish behaviour of fans who looted, smashed windows and burned vehicles for three hours in Vancouver after the Canucks lost to the Bruins in the Stanley Cup final Wednesday night.
More than 100 people have been arrested — with additional arrests expected — and 15 cars, two of them police cruisers, were set on fire. Vancouver Police Chief Jim Chu blamed the carnage on “anarchists and criminals” who had outfitted themselves for the rioting with masks and goggles, and who he says had participated in violent protests in the past.
That sounds like a bit of public relations spin to deflect attention away from the more likely possibility that these were ordinary youthful Vancouverites, overdosing on testosterone and stupidity, ready to take out their anger at losing the Cup, albeit incomprehensibly targeting their own city. They were dressed for the most part in Canucks jerseys, for one thing, which is something “anarchists and criminals” wouldn’t do. They can certainly be categorized as criminals, given their lawlessness Wednesday night, but Chu makes it sound as if they specifically organized to trash the downtown, as part of their career criminality. Moreover, “anarchists” who frequent violent protests do so for political reasons, not because a hockey team lost a game.
No, these were most likely ordinary youthful Canadians showing a disgusting dearth of sportsmanship and an equally disgusting un-Canadian proclivity toward mindless violence, of the sort usually associated with the yobs and rowdies who riot after British soccer matches.
However, a truly Canadian attitude was at work Thursday morning in downtown Vancouver, as evidenced by the dozens of Vancouverites who, appalled at the wanton vandalism, arson and theft that left many storefronts boarded up, showed up with brooms in hand to help clean up the mess. Others took the opportunity to scribble messages of collective sorrow, sympathy and solidarity with those affected by the looting, on the boards covering the broken storefront windows.
Canadians are disappointed that the Cup slipped out of the Canucks’ hands and went home with the Bruins. It was especially hard to see a trophy representing Canada’s national sport head south for another year to rest with an American team. But the noble virtue of sportsmanship compels Canada to accept the loss with good grace; it’s not losing the Stanley Cup that has left a black mark on Canada, it’s the behaviour of the rioters in Vancouver.
In the end, it was just a game, and there’ll be more games. Hockey season starts anew in a few months, and next year, Lord Stanley may return to Canada — ideally, to the Red Mile.
Canadians have nothing to live down in losing to the Bruins. They can hold their heads high. It is only the rioters in Vancouver who should hang their heads in shame.
Read more:
Thursday, June 16, 2011
I'm almost embarrassed......
To be Canadian right now.
After the love-in that was the winter Olympics in Vancouver, some major IDIOTS decided to riot last night after the Canucks lost the Stanley Cup Final. While some of the fans were respectfully in their seats giving the Bruins their due, stores were looted, cars burned and flipped over and just major chaos and mayhem.
What gives you the right to tar our great nation and your beautiful city over a hockey game?
How 'bout you try growing up.
(Photo courtesy of the Calgary Herald)
After the love-in that was the winter Olympics in Vancouver, some major IDIOTS decided to riot last night after the Canucks lost the Stanley Cup Final. While some of the fans were respectfully in their seats giving the Bruins their due, stores were looted, cars burned and flipped over and just major chaos and mayhem.
What gives you the right to tar our great nation and your beautiful city over a hockey game?
How 'bout you try growing up.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)